Saying Sorry

I had a conversation with female friends the other day about apologising. It was very interesting. Although my grandsons will possibly be annoyed if they ever read this, we all thought that men find it more difficult to apologise than women. In fact women often apologise for things that they shouldn't, just to keep the peace. 

Research does indicate that women apologise more frequently than men. It is thought that this is due to different perceptions about what is offensive - Women have a lower threshold as to what constitutes offensive behaviour. Women are more likely to apologise for serious or emotional situations. Research suggests women may be more focused on maintaining harmony in relationships, while some men might feel that apologizing is a sign of weakness.

When my husband was alive I certainly felt the there was an imbalance between us in our view of what warranted an apology. Fortunately we still managed to have a good relationship, despite me feeling that getting an apology was like getting "blood out of a stone". 

Apologising in appropriate situations is important. We all need to take responsibility for mistakes or hurt caused. I just do not think that it is appropriate to apologise for something that the apologiser was not responsible for. So, for example, I don't think that countries can apologise for something wrong that happened historically. I also don't think an individual can apologise for someone else.

The current political spat between Starmer & Robbins is unedifying. It's a face off between supposed different perceptions of what happened. It reveals a pressurised culture & how difficult it must be to work at the top level of government when dealings are not transparent. It isn't good enough to have "plausible deniability" & lack of an honest & accurate record of what has happened. That enables individuals to evade responsibility. Good record keeping takes time, but it appears that there was a deliberate decision or instruction not to do that in this case. In todays tech world it is not difficult to record a meeting, unless instructed not to do so.

 

Frankly no one comes out of this well. It stinks! Starmers "apology" just isn't good enough.

Secrets & Lies

Although telling the truth seems to be a good aim to have, it isn't always possible. There can be valid reasons to either avoid the absolute truth, or even massage the truth. Information can do harm and good. People can be hurt by knowing the truth. We try to avoid doing that if we are sensitive to the feelings of others.

On the other hand I do think that knowingly lying is to be avoided at all costs if possible. Over my lifetime politics has changed immesurably. When I was younger there was a code of behaviour that was adhered to by most politicians. There was two way respect I think, us for them & vice versa. I'm sure there were secrets & lies that the public were not aware of. But the franchise transaction was that politicians acted in the best interest of the country & the people.

I struggle to believe that is true anymore. 

Politicians, for whatever reason, do not answer direct questions directly. They obfusticate & answer an entirely different question that was not posed. They are schooled to do that. It is deeply annoying & frustrating. They are actually the architects of their own public mistrust. Frankly they deserve what they get. Honesty would actually be very refreshing. 

Then there is "political plausible deniability" - a strategic tactic allowing leaders to evade responsibility for controversial, unethical, or illegal actions by ensuring no direct evidence links them to it. By utilizing ambiguous communication, surrogates, or fragmented chains of command, officials can credibly claim ignorance if the action is exposed, shielding themselves from accountability. The thing is that we know. They have been rumbled. We aren't idiots. This is the age of communication & investigative journalism. Sooner or later the truth usually emerges.

I have listened to the emerging information about the appointment of Mandelson as American ambassador for the UK. It is not black & white, there are shades of grey. But it does appear that Olly Robbins was "thrown under a bus" unfairly. People with more experience that me say clearly that "there was no abuse of process", not only was there no duty to disclose, but  the vetting system would collapse if they did. 

The issue for me is, given Mandelsons unsavoury history, I would have thought that a prime minister or the Foreign Office would have bent over backwards to ensure that this situation would not arise. Surely someone felt the need to ask detailed questions about possible outcomes of the appointment? 

This is a mess of the systems making. I can see that Enhanced Developed Vetting is deeply personal & private, but surely the buck stops with the Prime Minister & or the Foreign Secretary who ultimately make the appointment? There should have been questions asked without the necessity of private detail being revealed. 

I am amazed that this has been the way the UK runs vetting for years. Australias system is supposed to be very good. Maybe we should look at that. 

 

This week is going to be interesting if Olly Robbins appears before the Intelligence & Security Committee. 

Budgeting & Debt

I am in the fortunate position of knowing that my outgoings are covered by my income. It was not ever thus. I can remember, in my early marriage, we had no savings at all & all income was spent on the necessities of life, food, heating & rent for example. I can remember having egg & chips several times a week because it was cheap & filling. Everything was cooked from scratch & there were no "cook chill" meals. I wouldn't have been able to afford them even if there had been. We didn't go out for coffees & meals. Having a baby after just over a year of marriage put an extra strain on the household budget. I could no longer work.

As time went on both my husband & I had professional jobs & our income increased. We got on the housing ladder & left renting. We were able to save. Mortgages were manageable. Looking back my generation were lucky. But we did work hard for it & there were costs that were not financial. I felt I was like a hamster on a wheel juggling work, a home & family & elderly parents. 

We were quite frugal. We concentrated on the family, home & friends. We didn't have the many ways there are now to spend money. Life has changed substantially. There is more "stuff". Occasionally we bought big items on hire purchase, but basically we saved up for things we needed & wanted & paid cash. We didn't get into credit card debt because as far as I can remember we didn't have credit cards. The Barclaycard was introduced in 1966. The Access card came in in 1972. The 1980's & 90's started the widespread public adoption and reliance on credit cards. It also started the widespread reliance on credit card debt. 

As of early 2026, outstanding credit card debt in the UK has surpassed £70 billion, figures show a steady rise from previous years. Recent data indicates a 4.5% year-on-year increase in debt, while around 2.5 million UK adults are in persistent credit card debt. I find that truly shocking. Fiscal debt has become a way of life not only for individuals, but also for countries. Why should people manage their finances effectively if politicians think that fiscal debt is fine? The example is clear to see. Spending money you don't have is fine. Who needs to budget wisely if politicians don't?

A budget is a financial plan outlining projected income and expenses over a specific period, used to track spending, increase savings, and make informed financial decisions. I used to have a Boots diary which had an accounts section in the back that I filled in every week, so I knew where the money was going. It was a habit I learnt from my mother in law. I was obsessed with not overspending. There were very few luxuries. I made clothes for me & my daughter & even made a suit for my husband.  I cooked from scratch every day. We didn't pay people to work for us, we did our own maintenance on the house & the car. We managed to keep within our means & even save.

So we were able to move into better houses & profited from increasing values. 

It seems to me that today people want instant gratification. They have higher expectations of what the necessities of life really are. The concept of waiting until you have the money or lowering your expectations seems to have vanished. 

 

I'm really not sure that has made us happier.  

 

 

Strikes or Work to Rule?

I am struggling to find any reason to understand or support the UK resident doctors strike. Presumably everyone could argue that their pay had gone down in real terms since 2008 /9. To be clear, that's 18 years.

It's been a period of financial disasters. The Global Financial Crisis of 2007/8, the Great Recession of 2008/10, Brexit 2020, Covid 2020/21, the Cost of Living crisis 2022......Why should the doctors feel that they have a better case for pay increase than anyone else?

I appreciate the work all medics do. But there are a lot of people in caring professions I also appreciate, teachers, carers, nurses, social workers, all first responders....I would argue that all of these are vocations. All of them should seriously consider the impact of their strike action on other people, or they may well be held to be simply completely self interested. That is not what we expect from caring professions. I can see a justification for working to rule, because all of these professions only work effectively because of good will. But 15 strikes in 3 years. That is an appalling record & nothing to be proud of. 

It is important that any workers have the right to air grievances & negotiate pay & working conditions. I do think that unions & professional organisations have an important role to play in protecting their members. Individuals have very little power, but acting together empowers all. That right is important, but should not directly endanger the health or life of others. There should be effective alternatives such as negotiation, mediation & arbitration, entered into in good faith by both sides.

The mechanism should not be mechanised & turned into war. 

There has to be realism on both sides. It seems to me that not just the UK, but the whole of Europe is in a dire financial situation. There is widespread instability & disaffection with politics & politicians. Everyone's infrastructure is creaking under the load of population growth & change. Managing an economy must be a poisoned chalice in the face of international wars affecting everything. There will be very difficult choices as to where the money we have goes. It's mostly borrowed money anyway. We no longer have big gold reserves or a booming economy.

We will all have to face up to that. The resident doctors are ignoring the reality of the situation we are all in. It is blindly selfish & unaffordable to ask for a 26% pay rise. 

  

War & Geography

I am a big fan of Tim Marshall a British journalist & broadcaster. In particular his books "Prisoners of Geography"- 2015 & "The Power of Geography"- 2021. The former book's 6th chapter deals with the Middle East. The latter book's 2nd chapter is Iran. It's a shame that Trump & Netenyahu didn't read that before they embarked on their illegal war with Iran. Iran is mostly mountains & deserts. That makes a land war really difficult. But thuggish leaders don't tend to fight that kind of war now. They use drones & missiles.

The Gulf of Hormuz at it's narrowest is just 34 km across. The width of the actual shipping lane is just over 3 km. This means that Tehran can threaten to close it to everyone else, as Marshall pointed out in his book. "One fifth of global oil supplies pass through it, (so) closure would mean a world of pain".  We are in that world of pain because that is exactly what Tehran has done, very effectively & predictably. If Marshall knew that in 2021 why didn't Trump & Netenyahu & their acolytes?  

Surely they did, or someone advising them did. But they chose to ignore it. They chose to mount a war they couldn't actually win. They chose to invade a country without any legal reason to do so. They chose to kill & maim innocent civilians & destroy the infrastructure of a country. Why? Simply because they could. 

Men who have no moral compass. No conscience. No care for the pain & suffering they cause. Egotistic men who crave power & money. Men consumed by hubris, self confidence & deluded self belief in their own importance. Both men trying to evade justice & the legal system for crimes they are accused of committing. I don't know what the psychological definition of their personality types is, but it isn't anything good in a leader of a country.

Meanwhile the world looks on watching the devastation in so many places in our world today. Ukraine, Gaza & the West Bank, Iran.....Seemingly politics & politicians are helpless. The United Nations, what a misnomer, is unable to act because of veto's. But at least Guterres does speak out eloquently & compellingly. It all reminds me of the Jugoslav Wars between 1991 - 2001. History repeating itself as usual.

We humans seem to learn nothing. We just keep repeating the same mistakes & let tyrants win. Where is Democracy? Where is Justice? It isn't here now.  

 

Renewal, Religion & War

Easter is an important festival for Christians. It happens when spring is in full blossom & is a symbol of renewal for many, even if, like me, they are not believers. Hindus have the festival of Holi which celebrates the victory of good over evil among other things. Jews have Passover which commemorates liberation from slavery. The Persian new year, Nowruz, is the rebirth of nature. Buddhists have Songcran new year which symbolises purification.....

Yet at this wonderful time of year, when everything is literally springing into life, death & destruction is marching through huge areas of the world. In many cases not literally marching, because war today is death fought like a computer game, by missiles & drones. You don't have to look your victims in the eye & experience actually killing them. You do it from a bunker or from behind your own lines. You are removed from the reality of actually taking a life, seeing the blood, seeing the spirit depart, seeing the injury you have inflicted.

All of this at the behest of despotic & deranged leaders, who often claim some sort of religious belief, like Trump, Putin & Netenyahu. Weirdly they claim belief in Christianity, Orthodoxy & Judaism. Three religions with basically the same fundamental beliefs. All are monotheistic and Abrahamic. Anyone claiming to believe in god is also held to the same necessity to behave in a morally good way. The commandments of Christianity for example. Thou shall not kill & Thou shall not bear false witness spring to my mind. All 3 of these leaders routinely break those commandments. Shame on them.

If there is some spiritual being, some presence outside of our understanding, these men will surely face some sort of judgement & punishment. I sincerely hope they do, although I cannot imagine what punishment fits their dreadful crimes against humanity & our beautiful planet. 

Spring reminds us all that there is the possibility of renewal. It arrives every year & is an opportunity to reflect. I don't have much hope that the truly morally deficient leaders in our world will take the opportunity to reflect & be renewed in a better way. But I do hope that the people everywhere who oppose them & what they stand for will find the courage to oppose them & bring them to face justice. 

Having a Voice

Being a teacher means that I used my voice a lot & also was often exposed to childrens infections. Every time I got a cold it turned into something worse, laryngitis, strep throat, bronchitis, pneumonia & pleurisy. Even now I'm retired I don't seem to be able to just get a cold & I often lose my voice. As I live alone & don't talk to myself much - yet, it isn't a huge problem. 

But communicating & speaking is an important part of our lives. Our relationships & our work lives depend on it. Today we can communicate through other means, text & email for example. But they are open to misinterpretation in a way that speech isn't, because there are context clues with speech - tone of voice, facial expression & body language for example.

However that isn't really what I'm thinking of in this post. I'm thinking of the voice that we each have to influence other people & big decision making. I think that we forget that our individual opinion can be really important in the areas of politics & philosophy. If we speak out individually in social contexts we may or may not influence what others think. But if we disagree with a point of view I feel that it is important to be able to express it. Unfortunately it is often the case that we don't speak out for fear of offending or upsetting others. Or we just aren't confident or brave enough. But letting an unacceptable point of view pass is colluding with the speaker. It's actually cowardly.

People have fought for the rights of free speech. People have fought for the right to vote. People have fought for the right to be part of a collective like a union or professional organisation. One voice in the wilderness may not have much of an impact. But protests & marches can be powerful demonstrations of a groundswell of opinion that should not be underestimated. That is how change for the better happens. Think of Votes for Women, LGBT rights, Grenfell & safer Homes, the Right to Roam, Apartheid, Fracking....

Our right to protest, which is central to a healthy, functioning democracy, is under threat. The police have huge powers to restrict protests and arrest demonstrators under the Crime and Policing Bill.

https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/eight-repeat-protests-that-achieved-change/

Having a voice & using it is very important. Use it or lose it. Losing your voice means far more than being dumbstruck. It means losing your power to affect change for the better.

 

Civil War?

Yesterday I went to a discussion about the possibility of Civil War between Profs David Betz & Jonathan Portes as part of the Oxford Literary Festival. I found the former cogent & compelling & the latter surprisingly poor & arrogant.

I remember clearly the discontent & violence of the 60's - 80's. 

I think the 60's was the start of  profound social, economic, and political tensions that signalled a breakdown in traditional social norms and trust in authority. There was industrial unrest & economic weakness, declining trust in government, race & immigration tension, class divide & social inequality among others. Does that ring any bells?

The 70's brought all of that plus inflation near 30%. Resulting in the "winter of discontent" in 1978 / 79 with widespread strikes, a 3 day working week, rubbish not being collected & energy shortages - The lights literally went out. 

The 80's heralded huge economic & political divisions & Thatchers conservative government, with a decline of traditional manufacturing, mass unemployment, industrial conflict, and severe urban unrest. Not to mention privatization selling off so much of our infrastructure & services. The miners strike of 1984 / 5 was a bitter industrial dispute handled very confrontationally by the government & the police. That was so bad that there is finally going to be an official inquiry into the violent policing at Orgreave. Then there was the Poll Tax riots & the inner city riots in Brixton, Toxteth, Handsworth, (which I knew well) & Moss Side.

So, no one can tell me that civil war can't happen here. All of that laid the foundations for the society we live in today. But all of the metrics have got worse.

 

But there are significant differences that also make the situation worse.  I will just make 2 points. 

There is universal distrust of politicians & politics in general, with good reason. It is arguable that we do not have a functioning democracy & the complexity of governing has increased exponentially, requiring a cadre of very experienced & skilled leaders that are markedly absent. The 3 party system is past it's sell by date.

We live in a age of rapid communication. We all have powerful computers literally in our hands. We have instantaneous access to both reliable & unreliable information. It is difficult to differentiate between truth, lies & conspiracy theory. Equally it is easy to whip up discontent & anger & organise protests which can easily turn violent. 

I really hope that the curtailment of the right to protest & aggressive policing epitomised by "kettling" is not used to address the discontent evident between the "have's" & the "have not's". But I fear that we are in danger of ignoring the indicators that things are seriously unacceptable to so many people. I can envisage rioting & civil war because I have seen the foundations laid.

That is, of course, if we don't find ourselves in a 3rd world war. 

Keeping Calm & Carrying On?

The balance between keeping well informed on world events & seriously worrying about the consequences of the self serving behaviour of some countries leaders is difficult. Personally I think that Trump, Netenyahu & Putin should be indicted & hopefully found guilty & imprisoned. I know that I am judging before hearing all the evidence & argument. But I look at verified sources &  having been a Magistrate for many years, I feel that the evidence is overwhelming. Beyond reasonable doubt. 

The people of the world are facing real harm caused by these men. Everything from death & injury, to loss of their homes & infrastructure, & at the other end of the scale a huge increase in the cost of living. Millions of people are adversely affected worldwide. We in the UK are fortunate, we aren't in the firing line, we just have to face increased costs & shortage of supply.

But it may not end there. I have listened to several respected sources, senior military people, politicians & commentators & the possible outcomes are truly dire. At one end of the scale the civil war risk in the UK is rising due to heightened social tension, economic strain, and polarization, with some experts projecting a potential 18.5% chance over five years. 40-53% of people in Western nations view world war as likely in the next 5-10 years. Former NATO deputy commander Richard Shirreff has warned that the current U.S. - Israel conflict with Iran could be the "final catalyst" for a third world war. We are thought to be in a second cold war fought through regional conflicts, proxies, and cyber attacks. Military analysts and historians warn that the international order is under "considerable strain". 

It is a bleak picture. We live in a very unstable & unpredictable world that has some power & wealth hungry men in charge. 

So what can individuals do? We are not without power. We need proactive, sustained action by individuals to reduce political polarization, mitigate inequality, and foster communication across divides. We need an intelligent & rational response by the masses to counter the actions of the few who have no regard for human rights or fairness. We need to stand up to bullies & challenge extremism in all it's forms. We need to be very selective about our use of media in all it's forms. 

Most of all we need to use our "democracy" & use our vote to elect principled leaders & hold them accountable. We need to ensure good civic education of our young people & support fairer electoral reform. We need to be empathetic towards the disposessed & treat others with respect, regardless of their nationality, race, or religion. We need to reduce economic inequality.

We, the population need to organise & use our power to ensure that the "bad actors" do not escape. We need to keep calm & carry on. ( 1939 catchphrase) 

 

Or we will deserve everything that we get & it will not be pleasant.  

Fiscal Debt & Quantitative easing.

Fiscal debt (FD) and quantitative easing (QE) are

closely linked through a central bank's purchase of government bonds (gilts), which effectively swaps long-term, fixed-rate government debt for short-term, variable-rate central bank reserves. High debt-to-GDP ratios are projected to hit 105% in developed markets by the end of 2026.

The UK has run a national debt for most of the last 300 years to fund wars, beginning in the 1690s. Debt has reached peaks above 200% of GDP after major wars.  It reached roughly 250% of GDP in 1946–47 following World War II. Debt-to-GDP fell steadily from the 1950s, reaching a low of 24% in 1991–92.

The Bank of England was founded specifically to manage a £1.2 million loan to the government. There have been brief periods of budget surpluses—years where it earned more than it spent, under both Thatcher's & Blair's governments. We used to have significant gold reserves. Not now. More than half was sold off at historically low prices between 1999 & 2002. Personally that seems to me a major financial mistake.

I wouldn't run my personal life on the basis of FD & QE, so am at a loss to understand the massive debt we have got ourselves in. So who pays the price of all this - taxpayers, users of services & future generations. In other words you & me & our children & grandchildren. A significant portion of the debt is owned by UK pension funds, insurance companies, and banks, meaning the state owes the debt to people in the UK. Outcomes include rising costs & inflation.

Is the UK bankrupt? Well some say yes & some say no. Some commentators highlight the risk of a "sovereign debt crisis" or "running out of money. Others argue a sovereign nation issuing its own currency cannot go bankrupt. Personally I can only relate all of this to my situation & it doesn't stack up. Politicians & financiers deliberately use euphemisms & obscure language to confuse & obfusticate. If they told us the truth in plain English I might believe they knew what they were doing. So I'm deeply cynical.

 

If we can only keep going by borrowing more are we bankrupt?  I won't be paying the price, but my Grandchildren will. So will yours.  

Questions & Answers

I had a cold phone call about my energy. Within seconds I registered that it was a cold call & told the woman I wasn't interested & hung up. My brain filtered, reacted & made me speak appropriately in a few seconds. That is amazing computing power. Especially as my brain has been around for decades, so it's surprising it's still working.

The human brain reaction time averages 0.25 secs for visual stimuli,0.17 secs for audio, and 0.15 secs for touch. The total time to perceive, process, and respond to a stimulus, typically ranging from 0.1 - 0.3 secs. Age, fatigue, exercise, and stimulus complexity influence speed.

 

Given how lucky we are to have powerful brains it is amazing how prone we are to making mistakes. We are fallible. All sorts of factors come into play. 

A combination of psychological, social, and situational factors shape how choices are evaluated. Key factors include cognitive biases, emotional state, risk propensity, personal values, social pressures, time constraints, and the availability of information

. 

 

Each day we make decisions, even down to what socks to put on. Each day we have complex conversations, social, at work, in a shop, on a phone...Our brain is always working. If someone asks me a question I don't know the answer to, I can usually find out the answer. I just have to check that I am using a verifiable source, there is so much misinformation out there. So many unreliable outpourings of information without evidence from spurious sources.

 

It is worth taking the time to think about important questions - "knee jerk" reactions are not usually the best. I would always try to go for due consideration over speed. Speed without consideration doesn't usually result in reliable choices & decisions.

 

I think that is becoming a real problem for politicians & people making decisions that affect all of us. We aren't prepared to give them time to formulate answers to very complex problems. We are also very intolerant of mistakes. We don't like it if they change their minds. They in turn are becoming more and more wary of answering direct questions & committing themselves to a course of action or an opinion.

 

Truth is important, but it becoming increasingly difficult to find. However, you have been given a brain & access to reliable, evidence based, information, so use it. Don't just follow the herd or the charismatic leader or influencer who shouts loudest. 

 

Trauma & Pain

At some point in our lives we will all experience trauma & pain - Both physical & emotional. Some more than others. I once had to write down all the trauma I have experienced in 81 years It covered both sides of a sheet of A4 - typed! Weirdly I had to keep going back to it & adding things I had missed. Some were surprisingly important, but I hadn't initially remembered them. I later wondered if my brain had put them in a box & hidden them away.

We are shaped by experience. At some point we learn that bad things happen. Initially we may well feel that we cannot cope & be utterly devastated. But eventually the "penny drops" & we understand that trauma can't be avoided, so we have to learn to deal with it. It helps if we are supported by friends & family, but ultimately we have to find the resources within ourselves.

There are millions of people in our world who are dealing with trauma far worse than anything I have faced. People without the basic necessities of life, people living under dreadful repressive regimes, people living with war.....In our relatively safe & comfortable lives sometimes we cannot find it within ourselves to sympathise & empathise enough to not only say we support them, but more importantly take action to aid. 

I watched a Ken Loach film from 2023 - "The Old Oak". I was very moved. It's about a group of Syrian refugees sent to an old mining community in County Durham. The community was devastated by the miners strike & is poor. They didn't know the refugees were coming & were initially hostile & in some cases racist. Both communities were traumatised by life. But gradually the things that were common to both & their innate humanity brought them together. Although it is a sad film, it is very uplifting & has a message we should all hear.

The things we all have in common, whatever our religion or culture, are bigger than the things that divide us. Sadly sometimes we don't seem to be able to see that. We cause eachother trauma & pain because we only see difference. We think our way of doing things & thinking is the only right way. We are deluded. We can be extremely narrow minded & extreme in our views. 

I have reached the point in life where I abhor extremists of any religion or nationality. I see no difference between extreme right wing or left wing politics. I see no difference between extreme Islam & extreme Christianity. We all need to find a middle way rooted in our common humanity. If that means we need to be more tolerant, more willing to share, more willing to distribute wealth & resources more fairly, I'm willing to do that. Farirness is not just an important concept, we need to put it into practice.

 

 Are you? Because if you are not the current instability will only get worse. 

A Difference of Opinion, Mediation & Negotiation

I have always had friends who have had different political opinions to me. Although I have lost friends for various reasons over the years, I don't think I have ever lost a friend because of political differences. It is more likely to have been because of a misunderstanding, or because of something said or done which was unacceptable at the time. Some have just drifted away or moved away. Relationships & people change. 

I think it is important to be able to discuss personal feelings & opinions. Having strong opinions is not a bad thing. "Standing your ground" & "fighting your corner" verbally should be acceptable. What is not acceptable is verbal or physical abuse. Even losing your temper can be a sign of immaturity & weakness. Aggressive shouting means you have "lost the plot". 

I think this holds on a micro & a macro level. In personal & international relationships.

After getting medical retirement in my mid forties I was lucky enough to have several really interesting & challenging volunteer jobs over the next 40 odd years. One was being a mediator for a charity called "Resolve". The training programme was based on the Quaker method & was very good. We mostly dealt with neighbour disputes. I was often surprised how intransigent people could be. I have actually experienced that myself with neighbours. One in particular was actually really intimidating. As mediators we always tried to mediate "face to face". But it wasn't unusual for people to refuse to talk directly to the people they were in dispute with. It depends on the individuals & the conflict. Separate, shuttle meetings are sometimes necessary. 

I watched " The Zero Line" BBC documentary this week. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002rxvc

War is always shocking. But this was another level. It showed the lengths Putin & his generals & politicians are prepared to go to in order to fight his illegal war in Ukraine. The senseless brutality of the killing of his own soldiers who do not want to fight is horrific. 

Wars always end in negotiation. No one wins a war. My point is that simply going to war is failure. Failure of listening. Failure of understanding. Failure of seeing someone else's point of view. We are adversarial. The UK justice system & politics are both adversarial. If we want to avoid conflict & war we have to change our attitudes. Everyone has to be prepared to be more inquisitorial. Where there are disputes people need to treat eachother with respect & listen to alternative points of view.

 

The 8th of March was International Womens Day. Before Maggie Thatcher in 1982 & Indira Ghandi in 1971 there hadn't been a woman who started a war since Empress Matilda in the 12th century. Women, by an large, are less aggressive than men. They tend to be caring & concilliatory. 

Until we learn to resolve conflict, respect difference, & mediate or negotiate out of situations, wars will continue. People will die & be mentally & physically injured. Buildings & infrastructure will be demolished. 

It's all such a waste. 

 

Losing my Mind

I once started to write a novel set in a school, (for obvious reasons). It came to nothing. But I remember the opening line - "Here I sit, losing my mind & minding my loss". While I loved teaching, being the head of a very large primary school, 450 children, was stressful. I didn't lose my mind though.

Now, although I don't feel I am losing my mind, I do feel less confident in my memory. I, who was really well organised, who felt on top of a professional job, running a family & home, plus organising holidays & a social life. 

Ageing does that to you. Bits of you wear out. I sometimes think about the amount of data stored in my brain over a period of 81 years. No wonder retrieval is tricky. Then there is the small miracle of a heart beating consistently for all that time - Aided now by a pacemaker & a daily handful of drugs. Not to mention all the other organs in a body. It is a miracle & we shouldn't take it for granted. Especially as life expectancy in the UK has increased by 10 -15 years since I was born.

But we do. We think living is our right. We think we are individually important. We think we will all live to old age. But we are grains of sand on an infinite beach. We are part of a whole, but of little consequence individually. We can all contribute something to the community or society we live in. We are all special in some way, we all have something we are good at. We just need to use what we have been given.

Knowledge is gained cumulatively through endevour & experience. There has to be effort & openness to learn. We are born with huge brain capacity. The popular idea that humans only use 10% of their brain is a myth; we actually use 100% of our brains. Brain imaging technology, such as fMRI and PET scans, show that almost every part of the brain is active over a 24-hour period, even while sleeping. 

 

Age related memory loss is frustrating. But forgetting what you were going to do, someone's name, an appointment, where something is, none of that is as serious as dementia. It is normal. I'm not losing my mind, I'm just misplacing the data temporarily, it usually comes back. If I'm doing a general knowledge crossword I can usually see an image of the answer, but not remember the word. I have a very visual memory. 

It's a case of "use it or lose it". Exercise increases the blood flow to the brain, socialising keeps the mind sharp, doing puzzles, reading & learning new skills & a good diet - all are important for the brain. If you don't want to lose your mind you have to actively stimulate it.

But you also have to give your brain a rest. So I do wonder whether our addiction to the constant stimulation of mobile phones & computers is a good thing. I was on a bus yesterday. Two pram pushing mothers got on. They spent the whole journey scrolling on their phones, not looking at their children. Only one mother spoke to her child - to say "no". Around 37% of children joining Reception in 2025 in the UK were not considered "school ready," an increase from 33% in 2024. I'm not surprised. 

  

 

Bombarded

Occasionally I feel bombarded, usually by my "to do" list, which never seems to get shorter. Sometimes I feel bombarded by emails, but I delete a lot of them. When I am researching for a blog post there are times when I feel bombarded with information & have to spend a lot of time sifting the "wheat from the chaff". There is a lot of chaff!

But I am not being bombarded by bombs & missiles. It is beyond my capacity to imagine what that feels like. The thought of the harm done to children mentally & physically makes me feel sick. To be in a perpetual state of fear, knowing that each minute might be your last is beyond comprehension. 

The sheer number of drone attacks & missiles that aggressors are able to fire is frightening. Russia launched 288 missiles at Ukraine in February 2026, the highest monthly total since the beginning of 2023. In addition to the missiles, Russia deployed 5,059 long-range drones against Ukraine. As of May 2025, Israel had dropped approximately 100,000 tons of explosives on the Gaza Strip since the start of its military campaign on October 2023. The amount of explosives dropped on Gaza now far exceeds the combined bomb tonnage dropped on Dresden, Hamburg, and London during World War II.

Yet governments do not publish accurate, comprehensive, information about the costs of war. They do not say how many soldiers, non combatants, children are killed or injured. They do not publish the financial cost of the armaments & machinery of war, which must be astronomical. They do not publish the cost of clearing the devastation caused by the bombardment, or the cost of rebuilding the infrastructure & property. Long-term expenses like veteran care, interest on debt, or indirect economic losses are omitted, frequently hiding true costs from the public.

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute tracks official budgets whose total expenditures often far exceed published figures. https://www.sipri.org/

But don't we have a right to know? War is paid for out of our taxes. There isn't a "War Fairy" or a "War Money Tree". We work and Income Tax is deducted from our wages. We pay National Insurance Tax. We buy things & pay Value Added Tax. We die & if we are lucky enough to have enough savings we pay Inheritance Tax. 

 

We have a democracy of sorts, it's better than none. We vote politicians in to make informed decisions on our behalf. (I use the term loosely, because I don't see a lot of evidence that is true). But we don't require them to give us enough information after the decisions have been made as to whether they were justifiable & right. We certainly don''t require them to give a full report on all the costs of taking us to war.

I'm not saying that war is wrong or unecessary per se. I do question how the vast amouts of money any war costs are found, when our infrastructure & systems have been failing for years through lack of funding. There are only a few ways the money is found, borrowing, quantitative easing, selling public assets or privatizing state-owned enterprises, (but we've already done that) & lotteries. 

Perhaps if the true costs of war had to be published, politicians would think twice. Especially if they had to face the consequences of their choices. Unfortunately they don't.

War & Peace

Over 130 armed conflicts are raging today, twice as many as 15 years ago. The highest profile ones are Israel v Gaza & the West Bank - over 72,000–75,000+ Palestinians have been reported killed, with thousands more missing under rubble - Russia v Ukraine - estimated fatalities have surpassed 1.5 million to 2 million  - Israel & USA v Iran - it's too early to calculate fatalities. Sudan & Mayanmar have also resulted in tens of thousands of fatalities.

https://warwatch.ch/explore/

https://www.statista.com/topics/13125/conflicts-worldwide-2025/?srsltid=AfmBOoqGENJY6txRcS5H7dfrEmQb-h81JfRE0O_TMpPwNx5gxmjh0E2z#topFacts 

"Lord of the Flies" by William Golding shows how close to the surface agression is in the male psyche. The current BBC drama is timely if it makes us think & try to stop this. Given the right circumstances we all have the potential to become feral. But fortunately some can resist.

War is catastrophic in every sense. It is a waste of human life & potential. A waste of resources. A waste of money. A waste of time. War causes displacement & huge population migrations. Non combatants flee, who can blame them? There is nothing good about war apart from the profits it generates for the arms industry & for the companies who go in after to reconstruct the devastated systems & cities. There is money in war. A lot of money. It is highly lucrative for a select group, specifically defense contractors, arms manufacturers, and certain private entities within the military-industrial complex. Profits are driven by government demand, not market forces, with companies often benefiting regardless of the conflict's outcome. It is rarely profitable for the nations as a whole, causing immense debt, destruction, and long-term economic damage. 

Why do we go to war when all the evidence is that it doesn't work & simply causes death, injury & devastation? Countries go to war to defend themselves, to increase their territory, power & security, resources & wealth, sometimes because of religion or to change the demographics of their country. Basically people fight when disagreements cannot be resolved peacefully. 

War is abject failure - Failure to negotiate & solve problems. If only the people who make the decisions could see that. War is not heroic, although some people do heroic things. I fail to see how the sort of death, injury & destruction we are seeing today can be anything other than failure. How have we reached a point where we can justify this modern warfare of drones & missiles, largely fought by people with computers at a distance? If you don't actually see the person you are killing & feel the impact of taking a human life face to face do you really take responsibility or feel the pain of what you have done? 

We have distanced ourselves from reality. We watch on a screen, on our TV's, computers & mobiles, like a computer game. We can switch it of at will. We do not have to face up to it. The people in charge certainly don't.  

 

Seeing the Whole Picture

To some extent we all have "tunnel vision". Not as in eyesight, but as in being completely absorbed in ourselves, those closest to us, or achieving a particular aim and not noticing or considering the different aspects or effects of what we are doing. Depending on the circumstances, it can be a good or bad trait.

Now I am old, when I walk I look down at the pavement because I have had several bad falls. I want to ensure that I don't trip up. The result of that is that I don't see what is around me & I have become stooped. Literally tunnel vision.

When I think back over the decades I can see that there have been micro & macro decisions that I have made, or other people have made for me, that have had unforseen consequences. In order to see the whole picture, you have to take into account what has gone before & also speculate on the possible outcomes of what you propose to do or not do. Once you have identified all available information you have to select the best way of going forward. It isn't always easy. You need evidence & possibly advice from other sources.

That is true for me in my life & also in the grander scheme of things - the bigger picture of the world I live in. But we humans are very bad at doing this. We make choices that are expedient at the time. We make choices in our own self interest & try to avoid choices that might adversely affect us. We are often driven by fear & ambition. We are more comfortable with the status quo & we don't like change. We don't want to move out of our "comfort zone". 

Individually this is sometimes difficult to deal with. A small individual mistake can have big consequences on events or people. Politically, internationally & at a country level, making the right decisions is seriously important. Hindsight is wonderful, but "pointing the finger" really doesn't get anyone anywhere. History teaches, but we are often blind to the lessons. Everyday seems to be "groundhog day" & everyone seems to "re-invent the same wheel". 

So we are stuck in a mess of our own making. Not just the politicians, but each of us individually, because we do have a democracy of sorts. We, the electorate, are, at the moment, able to speak freely & protest. In the case of privatisation for example we can see that it has failed us. The statistics show that a majority want our vital services in public hands. 

 

We just need to make our politicians see that they need to follow the "will of the people".  But you the people need to use your powers & vote. Turnout at the 2024 general election was 59.7%, which was the lowest at a general election since 2001. If you don't participate, you can't complain! And you certainly won't change anything. 

Electric Vehicles & the Weather

I drove from Oxford to Minchinhampton & back a week ago. I thought I knew how bad our roads are living in Oxford, but I was wrong. My journey took me along the A40 & then cross country to Cirencester via the A4425.

I was shocked at the state of the roads, whether A or B roads. We are all used to potholes now, but it was the frequency and the size - Both the depth, width & position of the holes. If they are at the side of the road & there is oncoming traffic you can't swerve out to avoid them. They must be lethal for cyclists. Similarly if they are in the middle of the road, where do you go? The damage being done to cars & the possibility of causing accidents must be high. 

 

Patching is obviously not the answer. All that does is to move the problem down the road, (sorry about the pun), because it is always a temporary solution. The cost & disruption caused by necessary proper maintenance required is obviously much higher. But why has this happened?

It must be a combination of 3 things, increasing volume of traffic, heavier vehicles & climate change e.g. rainfall. I can remember when my father was the first person in our street to get a car & everyone used public transport. We had trams in Birmingham. 

Now many families have more than one car, roughly a third. 78% of families have access to one or more cars. Add to that the increasing weight of cars. The average weight of new cars in the UK has risen by 400kg in 7 years due to SUV's & heavy batteries in electric vehicles. (Why & when did we move from estate cars to SUV's for extra space? Oh yes, like so much else, we copied America). Then multiply that by the huge weight of increasing goods vehicles & public transport. Climate change has meant that we have more frequent extremes of weather, named storms with much heavier rainfall & stronger winds, longer periods of high heat & drought. The only thing that doesn't seem to have increased is frost & extreme cold. But that too adds to the damage. 

It's a perfect storm, (again sorry about the pun), of circumstance added to years of lack of maintenance under the last conservative government. Between 2017 - 2023 council road resurfacing on A roads fell by 37%. The backlog of maintenance funding reached £16.3 billion in England & Wales. The focus was on reactive patching rather than long term preventative resurfacing that is much less cost effective. Austerity has put us where we are in so many areas. Local authority spending was cut by 25% betwween 2011 - 2020 for supposedly "non essential" spending.

The chickens have come home to roost. Bad short term decision making has resulted in huge problems in all of our infrastructure & services. That is the inheritance the labour government  has to deal with. Add to that the fact that the public allowed it all to happen. We could see what was happening & we didn't do enough to hold politicians accountable. 

The right to protest, the right to accurate information & effective oversight, the right to hold decision makers accountable & face legislation & justice must not be eroded. We are in a mess & getting out of it is our responsibility. We will have to pay, one way or another. Inaction is not an option.  

Diagnosis & Fear

Humans have the capacity to communicate through spoken language. We also give clues as to how we feel through facial expression & body language. We are unique. We also have the brain capacity to be able to think & understand all of these & more.

What has that to do with Diagnosis? 

I am beginning to think that our need to have a name, a diagnosis of a medical condition, might occasionally not be advantageous. I wonder if it is too simplistic. Obviously if you have a cancer it is important to know what type & hopefully get it early when it is treatable. That must be true of many conditions. In order to treat successfully medics need to know what they are dealing with.

I think I am concerned more about "neurodivergence" & "mental health" issues. I do wonder if we are given a label we live up to that label. If I have a physical diagnosis there is usually strong scientific evidence & symptoms for that diagnosis. Hopefully if the diagnosis is correct the treatment will help, if not cure. 

Empiric evidence - which is based on experience, without precise knowledge of the cause or nature of the disorder is less reliable & is dependent on the skill & experience of the practitioner. We have devised question & answer tests for neurodivergence, but is that reliable? Divergence & difference is actually normal.

I think my point is that human beings are incredibly complex systems which include physiology & psychology. What we are at birth, our genes, can be modified by experiences - Nature & Nurture. The thing that troubles me today is that we have become very risk averse. Parents are more afraid for their children than in my childhood. Children don't have the freedom & life experience that I did & actually my daughter did too. 

We have also become more culturally afraid. I actually think that the public is being kept in a state of permanenet fear by politics worldwide. We are afraid of the international situation, (wars, rogue leaders...), climate change, food, water & energy security, privatised services not working, the list is endless. We are made to feel powerless. Cynically I believe that this is deliberate at some level, so that the powerful can retain that power by convincing us we need them to solve everyhting. 

All of this is perpetuated by the press & media that constantly bombarding us with the current news reason to be afraid. There is endless diagnosis of whatever that is, with "experts" being hauled in to give their views, which are mostly pure speculation. It might happen, but the chances are it won't. How much postitive news do we hear?

I do think my parents generation & my generation were more resiliant. Shit happens, we understood that & we got on with it. We didn't expect or get a diagnosis or a label to put on it. We knew we just had to deal with it. 

 

  

 

Unintended Consequences

My house was completely re-designed, gutted & refurbished. I am delighted with it. I had an expensive quartz worktop installed in the kitchen. In order to protect it I put a clear plastic tray where I stack the dirty dishes. Over time I discovered a discolouration in the quartz underneath. Not a spillage or stain, something within the very light coloured quartz. Uncleanable. Apparently it's due to UV light from the south facing window. A known issue, but not on the website of the company supplying the quartz & not known to me. A completely unintended consequence. Very annoying.

Yesterday, driving home, I listened to "Toxic" on Radio 4. All about "forever chemicals" like PFAS. These have been man made since the 1940's and are grease, water & heat resistant. Really useful, we all thought. Widely used & present in almost everything - non-stick pans, waterproof clothing, food packaging, cosmetics, the list is endless. Also prevalent now in drinking water, the environment & us. They are extremely persistent & bioaccumulate. Unfortunately they are also linked to serious health risks - cancer, immune system disruption, fertility & developmental issues. Who knew that something so useful could be so dangerous? 

There have been three types over the years - PFOA, PFOS & the latest PFAS. There are over 10,000 different types. They all persist in the environment & our bodies for decades. We have only just woken up to the harm of these forever chemicals & governments are finally going to monitor their presence & do something about their use. It's a bit late though. They are already literally everywhere.

What long term effect will the presence of these chemicals have on both the environment & us? How long have people been aware of the dangers posed to everything? Did manufacturers of these chemicals do enough research into side effects? Or were they simply focussed on their profitability? Did they hide the issues, as has happened so many times before? For example as the petrochemical industry & the drug industry did?

Our fixation with growth & profitability. Our fixation with making life easier because we are so busy & are so time poor. Our heedless march into the future & the unknown. Our lack of interrogation of the possibilities, good & bad, attached to change. Our lack of money & incentive to research & do due diligence. All of these are coming home to roost.

It's a perfect storm leading to disastrous unintended consequences. We need to stop & really think. 

Nationalisation versus Privatisation

Nationalisation is public ownership of private assets, industries or companies. It's often done to manage monopolies, market failures or secure infrastructure. The aim is to prioritise public interest over private profit & ensure service quality & efficiency.  

Privatisation is the transfer of ownership of assets, services or industries to the private sector. The aim is to increase efficiency, reduce government debt & foster competition.

As with everything there are pros & cons for both. 

Pros - Nationalisation is supposed to increase investment in infrastructure, lower prices for consumers, ensure better working conditions for workers & improve strategic control. Cons - Lower efficiency, lack of innovation, political interference & high costs.

Pros - Privatisation is supposed to increase efficiency, reduce public spending, reduce political interference & improve innovation. Cons - Higher consumer prices, job losses, prioritisation of profit over public service, environmental damage & loss of public accountability.

Since the Thatcher government of 1979 the UK has undergone extensive privatisation of major state owned utilities & industries - energy, telecommunications, water, transport, Royal Mail, steel, shipbuilding, aerospace, parts of the NHS, the Private Finance Initiative, justice, education, probation & social care. In other words a huge number of areas that directly affect the lives of every UK citizen. The tragedy is that has meant our services are worse, everything is a lot more expensive & jobs & working conditions have been adversely affected. Its a really dismal picture. 

 

At the same time salaries & bonuses for the people at the top who run these privatised areas have gone through the roof reaching record levels in 2024 -2025. For many, following consecutive years of increase above inflation & workers wages. Bonuses too reached record levels despite very poor performance in some areas. Shareholders, who are presumably doing well too, voted for these bonuses & pay levels. Hardly an independent voice. It's not edifying to see the bosses & shareholders doing so well when the people who work for them are struggling to provide for their families. 

Sadly privatisation has been a failed experiment because of it's adverse impact on people, the environment & what has been privatised. There are things that are so fundamental to a society being able to function well, that they need to be managed for the benfit of that society by those with a vested interest in them. They need to have effective oversight. Water companies have been a catastrophic example of privatisation failure. 

I can apply similar arguments for the selling off of major infrastructure to foreign, not always benign actors. This has followed on from privatisation. So now a significant portion of the UK's critical national infrastructure is owned by foreign governments or companies & sovereign wealth funds - water, energy & power, airports & ports, transport, digital infrastructure. 

What on earth were our government thinking? Well obviously they wern't "risk assessing" or considering possible & probable outcomes in the face of changing circumstances in the future. What they were doing was two things - raising money so that they could keep taxes low & create wealth, thus retaining power. But not only wealth for the country, but for themselves & their network of business friends & acquaintances.

It all started with Mrs Thatcher, but her party has continued the rot for years. So now we are in real trouble & it is debatable whether we can extract ourselves from the mire. We need effective long term planning, but our political system is not set up to do that. Decisions are made in order to keep power in local elections & ensure a second or third term in government. 

We really need highly intelligent, experienced & skilled people to do the evidence based 5 -10 year planning. Not politicians, who generally know nothing about their brief when they become ministers. It used to be the job of the Civil Service. But now we have lobbyists & special advisors. As of March 2025, there were 130 special advisers (SpAds) employed across the UK government, representing roughly 0.02% of the total Civil Service. While the number of registered lobbyists is not centrally capped, research indicates a significant "revolving door," with 31% of former special advisers moving into corporate lobbying or advisory roles. These are not elected & we know little about them & what they do. 

It all needs to be a lot more efficient & transparent.  

 

 

Vetting Process

Vetting is a comprehensive, multi-step investigation of an individual's background, qualifications, and integrity before employment or partnership, particularly for roles requiring security clearance. Developed Vetting is used for government or police roles. National Security Vetting is used for government roles. A security & risk assessment is part of the process & includes financial checks (credit, bankruptcy), social media reviews, and, in some cases, interviews with security officers regarding personal life, associates, and family. For high-level vetting, inspectors investigate potential vulnerabilities, such as financial debt, relationships, or past behavior that could lead to coercion or corruption.

Honestry is mandatory & dishonesty shows a lack of integrity & should result in failure.

The Propriety and Ethics team in the Cabinet Office undertake the due diligence process. Mandleson was supposedly subjected to Developed Vetting. After his ambassadorial appointment he was apparently National Security vetted by UK Security Vetting. 

The question is why, in view of all this, he was ever appointed to such an important role? He obviously lied, but why was he believed? Or was this simply a bad political decision for expediency reasons? Questions were supposedly put about Mandlesons ongoing relationship with Epstein. But wern't  his answers thoroughly checked?

 

The Met is conducting a criminal investigation into the leaking of sensitive information to Epstein & the relationship with him, so we won't get full discolsure until that is finished. But there are serious questions about PM Starmer & chief of staff McSweeny, (who was a protege of Mandleson & pushed for his ambassadorial appointment). 

This is serious enough to bring down not only the prime minister but the government itself. If it were an isolated error of judgement it might not be so bad, but it is only one of several policy reversals, "U-turns," and political misjudgements, since labour came to power in July 2024;- 

• Freebies Scandal 
• Winter Fuel
• 2 Child benefit 
• Tractor Tax
• Universal Credit 
• Employment Rights
• Worker Status Reform
• House of Lords Reform  

I've probably missed some. But you get the picture. 

I'm prepared to believe that Starmer does have the right purpose, attitude, morals & values. But his great fault is perceived lack of good judgement. Parliament is a hornets nest. The hornets will attack weakness. 

Labour were out of power for 14 years. You would think that during that time, as well as being an effective opposition, they would have prepared for government. Especially as it became more & more obvious what a complete mess the consevatives had made of their time in government. The public were more than ready for change. We also wanted a clean government, without all the sleaze & entitled arrogance that typified particularly the Johnson years. We wanted a government that actually represented the people's needs & wishes. 

Now we have chaos & a real possibility of a Reform government. Things couldn't be much worse at such a critical time internationally as well as here in the UK. 

 

 

Unlordly Lords.

Reform of the UK House of Lords has been discussed seemingly for all of my adult life. The House of Lords Reform Act 2014, allowed for the removal of peers who are convicted of serious offences and sentenced to imprisonment. But there are also questions about the fact that they are unelected & about the sheer numbers, currently 846! It is the largest upper house in the world and, as of late 2024, was roughly 25% larger than the House of Commons. The majority are life peers, alongside 26 archbishops and bishops (Lords Spiritual) and a remaining number of hereditary peers. In other words most of them are political appointees - 740 approx. 282 were conservative, 230 are Labour, 177 are crossbench. In addition  there are some lords who are ineligible to attend.

I am not impartial on this issue. I do think that a second chamber is beneficial. However members should be there because of their qualifications, experience & expertise. I also expect them to show evidence of ethics & service to others. They definitely should not be political appointees or generous donors to one party or another. They should be appointed by an independent committee representing the British people. Nor should, as was customary historically, top-level officials, such as Permanent Secretaries, Cabinet Secretaries, and Heads of the Diplomatic Service be given peerages for doing their job. I also think there should be parity between the upper & lower houses. Why on earth is it acceptable for the unelected Lords to be so much bigger than the commons? The current fillibustering of the assisted dying bill by a small number of lords is unacceptable, when it has beeen passed by the commons & the majority of the public support it. 

Then we get to the question of ethics as currently being discussed regarding Peter Mandelson who has had to resign twice from the cabinet, once as Ambassador to the USA & currently from the labour party. He is the grandson of Herbert Morrison, a labour statesman in the 2nd world war & postwar period, who would no doubt be shocked at the current scandal.

 

I haven't met Mandleson, frankly I wouldn't want to. I can only judge him by his actions & he seems to me to be very smug & self serving. Shady dealings with the rich & powerful seem to have followed his political rise to prominence. He seems to value wealth & power above all things & be prepared to do almost anything to move in those circles. At the very least his judgement seems to be extremely questionable. It's a pattern we see all too often in prominent men. He is not alone. Several lords have criminal records;- 

Lord Ahmed of Rotherham, convicted in 2021/2022 of serious sexual offences and attempted rape. 

Lord Brocket, served time in prison for insurance fraud involving valuable cars. 

Lord Sewel, resigned from the House of Lords in 2015 following a scandal involving alleged drug use and improper conduct, which led to a police investigation.  

Lord Archer, convicted in 2001 of perjury and perverting the course of justice. 

Lord Black of Crossharbour, convicted in the United States in 2007 of fraud and obstruction of justice.  

Lord Watson of Invergowrie, convicted of wilful fire-raising. 

Lord Taylor of Warwick, jailed in 2011 for false accounting. Lord Hanningfield, also convicted of false accounting.

Jonathan Aitken, former MP and minister who served a custodial sentence for perjury and perverting the course of justice. 

Mandleson is not alone & those are only the ones who have faced the full force of the law. 

Instead of talking about reform & setting up committees our politicians need to act & reform our government institutions. They are disfunctional. They do not serve us. We should not tolerate this abuse of power in the name of democracy. Politics & democracy have become dirty words.  

Wages, Salary, Inflation & Devaluation

Salary is a fixed, consistent amount of pay, (usually annual), regardless of hours worked, often featuring benefits and no overtime pay

. Wages are paid based on an hourly rate, fluctuating with hours worked, often including overtime, and common in retail or manufacturing roles.

 In simple terms professional roles tend to be salaried while manual roles are waged.

Inflation is a rise in domestic prices, reducing purchasing power, while devaluation is a fall in a currency's value relative to foreign currencies. It's often triggered by market forces or deliberate policy, making exports cheaper and imports costlier. High inflation typically leads to currency devaluation

. Generally inflation erodes what money buys inside a country, whereas devaluation weakens money's worth against other countries' money. Both are deeply linked as high inflation usually causes devaluation, and devaluation itself can fuel more inflation.

So far so good, although anything to do with mathematics isn't my forte.

This leads me into thinking about the people striking because their current wage or salary is less than in previous years in real terms. UK doctors' pay claims, led by the BMA, focus on restoring wages eroded by inflation, with recent actions pushing for significant uplifts. For example doctors argue pay has fallen significantly, (over 20% in real terms for some), since 2008. This is called pay erosion & they want pay restored to 2008 levels. You can find current pay levels for all doctors on the internet, so I won't give them here. 

My point is that this position seems to be completely untenable to me. Money & commodities fluctuate according to circustances. I imagine that doctors are not alone in being able to say that what they earn today is not worth what they earned in 2008. All employed people are subject to the same market forces. In any year pay increases will depend on what those forces are & how much money is in the kitty. Especially for so called public employees, teachers or the police for example.

What also seems untenable to me is that we have expectations that wages or salary will increase every year. Not only does that depend on a countries wealth, it also depends on how well people do their job & their productivity. It is well known that the UK, as a nation, is way behind in productivity. The UK's labour productivity consistently lags behind the US, Germany, and France, with output per hour worked significantly lower, around 20-40% below the US and 20% below major EU economies. This is largely due to underinvestment in capital and skills, slower growth since the financial crisis, and weaker competition/technology adoption in key sectors like retail and finance.

Finally, I think our whole wage / salary structure is completely unbalanced & rooted in class structure & history. As with so many areas in the UK, we need a complete overhaul & re-balancing to a fairer system. The gap between the "haves & have nots" is not working for us in the 21st century. As a lifelong liberal socialist I do think that withdrawl of labour is a right, but surely not for everyone. Surely there are occupations that are so vital to health, well being & the economy that there should be another mechanism? Possibly, given that so many of our organisations depend on goodwill to operate, working to rule would be far better. 

We need to end this cycle of disruption & get our act together. Especially as we are now into the age of technology & AI which will change things drastically.